Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú ¿µ¿ª¿¡¼­ÀÇ MIDFACIAL DEGLOVING APPROACHÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º

USEFULNESS OF MIDFACIAL DEGLOVING APPROACH IN ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL REGION

Â÷ÀÎÈ£, À±ÇöÁß, ÀÌÀÇ¿õ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Â÷ÀÎÈ£ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü
À±ÇöÁß (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü
ÀÌÀÇ¿õ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü

Abstract

¿ä ¾à
Midfacial degloving approachÀÇ ÀåÁ¡À¸·Î´Â ºñ°­, ºñÁß°Ý, »ó¾Çµ¿, »ç°ñµ¿, Á¢Çü°ñµ¿, ºñÀÎ
µÎ ºÎÀ§ º´¼ÒÀÇ Á¢±Ù¿¡ ÁÁÀº ½Ã¾ß¸¦ Á¦°øÇϸç, ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀÌ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼ö¿ùÇÏ°í, µÎ
ÇÇ°ü»ó Àý°³¹ý, ÃøµÎºÎ Àý°³¹ý, ±¸°³ºÎ Àý°³¹ý°ú ÇÔ²² »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼ö¼ú½Ã µû¸¦ ³ÐÈú ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸
¸ç, ¾È¸éºÎ¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ÈäÅÍ°¡ ¾ø¾î ½É¹ÌÀûÀ¸·Î ¸¸Á·½º·¯¿ì¸ç ƯÈ÷, Keloid üÁú¿¡¼­ À¯¿ëÇÏ
´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» µé ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
ÀÌ¿¡ ÀúÀÚµéÀº ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú ¿µ¿ª¿¡¼­µµ Á߾ȸéºÎ ¿Ü»ó, µÎ°³¾È¸éºÎ ±âÇü óġ, »ó¾Ç°ñ
ÀýÁ¦¼úÀ» ¿äÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì. »ó¾Ç°ñ°ú ºñ°ñÀÇ µ¿½Ã ¼ö¼úÀ» ¿äÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì µî¿¡ midfacial degloving
approach°¡ À¯¿ëÇÑ ¼ö¼ú Á¢±Ù ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
In the treatment of maxillary lesion including a maxillary sinuses, most of oral and
maxillofacial surgeons have used the vestibular incision for the Weber-Fergusson
incision. However incision has disadvantage which it provides a rather limited exposure
and the Weber-Fergusson incision leaves visible scar in the midface. Furthermore,
because the scar is confined on unilateral side only, the technique is hesitated to apply
especially in children, younger patients and women.
Since Casson first introduced midfacial degloving technique, this approach has been
used frequently to treat the lesion on nasal cavity, nasopharynx, skull base and
paranasal sinuses by ENT surgeons. But, we think this technique can be used usefully
in oral and maxillofacial regions.
So, we experienced favorable results which it provided a proper exposure, no visible
facial scar and it could be used on bilateral midfacial lesions.

Å°¿öµå

Midfacial degloving; Maxillofacial;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed